Triple

T14602769
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oghul-Khoimish E342744 entity
Predicate spouseClaimStatus P115011 FINISHED
Object disputed LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disputed | Statement: [Oghul-Khoimish, spouseClaimStatus, disputed]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: spouseClaimStatus
Context triple: [Oghul-Khoimish, spouseClaimStatus, disputed]
  • A. spouseStatus
    Indicates the marital relationship status between two individuals, such as whether they are currently spouses, formerly spouses, or not married to each other.
  • B. spouseIllegitimacyStatus
    Indicates the legal or social legitimacy status (e.g., legitimate, illegitimate) of a person’s spouse within the context of their relationship.
  • C. spouseWealthStatus
    Indicates the financial status or wealth level of a person’s spouse in relation to that person.
  • D. spouseRecognition
    Indicates that one entity formally acknowledges another entity as their spouse within a recognized relationship.
  • E. throughMarriageClaim
    Indicates that one entity asserts a right, status, or connection to another entity by virtue of a marital relationship rather than by direct or original entitlement.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822dec68081908c2553145c4051dc completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb43a1bb48190bf520cb961f15b5e completed April 14, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de656f9f4c81909f815b6629a9ee39 completed April 14, 2026, 4:03 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de716c17cc8190aeb85296abee85a7 completed April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:25 a.m.