Triple
T14565289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crook County, Wyoming |
E341769
|
entity |
| Predicate | state |
P87
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wyoming |
E45349
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wyoming | Statement: [Crook County, Wyoming, state, Wyoming]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wyoming Context triple: [Crook County, Wyoming, state, Wyoming]
-
A.
Wyoming
chosen
Wyoming is a sparsely populated U.S. state known for its vast plains, the Rocky Mountains, and iconic national parks like Yellowstone and Grand Teton.
-
B.
Wyoming
Wyoming is a small borough in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, situated in the historic Wyoming Valley along the Susquehanna River.
-
C.
Wyoming
Wyoming is a residential suburb on the Central Coast of New South Wales, Australia, known for its leafy streets, local shopping facilities, and proximity to Gosford.
-
D.
Montana
Montana is a small city in northwestern Bulgaria known as a regional administrative and economic center near the foothills of the Balkan Mountains.
-
E.
Montana
Montana was a former Swiss alpine resort municipality that later became part of the larger resort area of Crans-Montana in the canton of Valais.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822dcc6248190bed689984bceb0e2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69deb38c6350819091090ffd15772f6f |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd8ac485688190a2917251a7c8721a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:23 a.m.