Triple

T14550319
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Auburn Correctional Facility E341397 entity
Predicate hasPrisonManagementSystem P114908 FINISHED
Object Auburn system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Auburn system | Statement: [Auburn Correctional Facility, hasPrisonManagementSystem, Auburn system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrisonManagementSystem
Context triple: [Auburn Correctional Facility, hasPrisonManagementSystem, Auburn system]
  • A. hasInmateManagementPolicy
    Indicates that an entity has established rules or procedures governing the management and treatment of inmates.
  • B. hasPrison
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is the location of a prison associated with another entity.
  • C. operatedPrison
    Indicates that an entity managed, ran, or was responsible for the day-to-day operation of a particular prison.
  • D. hasPrisonerPopulation
    Indicates that an entity maintains or contains a population of prisoners, specifying the number or presence of incarcerated individuals associated with it.
  • E. prisonType
    Indicates the specific category or classification of a prison associated with an entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822db9c8481908213ceb39585f792 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb2ed2b4c8190945bd26531c71f1f completed April 14, 2026, 9:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de5c546c7081909e27d504ec360c5c completed April 14, 2026, 3:25 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de610330a48190b558235a14c0dc9f completed April 14, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:23 a.m.