Triple
T14550187
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Clot |
E341394
|
entity |
| Predicate | isRevealedInLanguage |
P3681
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Arabic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arabic | Statement: [The Clot, isRevealedInLanguage, Arabic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isRevealedInLanguage Context triple: [The Clot, isRevealedInLanguage, Arabic]
-
A.
presentedInLanguage
chosen
Indicates that something (such as content, information, or a work) is expressed or made available using a particular language.
-
B.
knownInLanguage
Indicates that an entity is recognized, named, or expressed in a particular language.
-
C.
isLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
-
D.
hasLanguageRepresentation
Indicates that an entity is expressed, encoded, or represented using a particular natural or formal language.
-
E.
isScheduledLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is officially planned or designated to be used for a specific event, program, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822db9c8481908213ceb39585f792 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69deb2ed2b4c8190945bd26531c71f1f |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c546c7081909e27d504ec360c5c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:23 a.m.