Triple

T14529280
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mademoiselle Reisz E340859 entity
Predicate testsInEdna P114625 FINISHED
Object strength of artistic commitment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strength of artistic commitment | Statement: [Mademoiselle Reisz, testsInEdna, strength of artistic commitment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: testsInEdna
Context triple: [Mademoiselle Reisz, testsInEdna, strength of artistic commitment]
  • A. testsIn
    Indicates that one entity conducts or performs tests within, on, or using another entity.
  • B. tests
    Indicates that one entity examines, evaluates, or checks another entity or condition to determine its properties, performance, or correctness.
  • C. testedInCase
    Indicates that something (such as a method, component, or behavior) is exercised or verified within a particular test case.
  • D. testedFor
    Indicates that an entity has been examined or analyzed to determine the presence, absence, or level of another specified entity or condition.
  • E. appliedTest
    Indicates that a test has been administered or carried out on a particular subject or object.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822dac79c8190a84a073f3cbaced5 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dea051bc608190ad4d516c5e7bca43 completed April 14, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de5c518fc08190a6ce4d8be05c4c5d completed April 14, 2026, 3:25 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de5fb5ac548190932f238e37271741 completed April 14, 2026, 3:39 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:22 a.m.