Triple

T14528364
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lost in the Woods E340836 entity
Predicate isHumorousHomageTo P43127 FINISHED
Object 1980s rock power ballads LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1980s rock power ballads | Statement: [Lost in the Woods, isHumorousHomageTo, 1980s rock power ballads]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isHumorousHomageTo
Context triple: [Lost in the Woods, isHumorousHomageTo, 1980s rock power ballads]
  • A. hasHumorousTreatmentOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity presents or portrays another entity in a humorous, comedic, or joking manner.
  • B. isHumorousCharacter
    Indicates that the character is portrayed in a humorous way or primarily serves a comedic role in the context.
  • C. hasCulturalReference
    Indicates that one entity makes reference to, draws from, or is associated with the cultural content, symbols, or traditions represented by another entity.
  • D. hasIronicMeaning
    Indicates that something conveys a meaning opposite to or incongruent with its literal expression, creating an ironic effect.
  • E. paysHomageTo
    Indicates that one entity formally shows respect, reverence, or honor toward another, often acknowledging its superiority, influence, or authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822dac79c8190a84a073f3cbaced5 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dea051bc608190ad4d516c5e7bca43 completed April 14, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de5c518fc08190a6ce4d8be05c4c5d completed April 14, 2026, 3:25 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:22 a.m.