Triple

T14513042
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gulf common currency E340444 entity
Predicate currencyAreaType P18115 FINISHED
Object proposed regional currency area LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proposed regional currency area | Statement: [Gulf common currency, currencyAreaType, proposed regional currency area]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: currencyAreaType
Context triple: [Gulf common currency, currencyAreaType, proposed regional currency area]
  • A. currencyArea chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the geographic or economic region in which the other entity’s currency is officially used or valid.
  • B. currencyCountry
    Indicates that a given currency is officially used as legal tender in a particular country.
  • C. currencyFamily
    Indicates that two currencies belong to the same broader monetary family or classification, typically sharing a common origin, standard, or structural framework.
  • D. currencyOrigin
    Indicates the place or source from which a particular currency was originally issued or created.
  • E. currencyType
    Indicates the specific kind of monetary unit or currency associated with an entity or transaction.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822d9c0408190b9a2b3643e58bb4d completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de9a6c6054819086b4c0ce1d83fdc5 completed April 14, 2026, 7:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de5c4ccba08190a988bfda0bc9f5cb completed April 14, 2026, 3:25 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:21 a.m.