Triple
T14506234
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cycles of Time |
E340270
|
entity |
| Predicate | theoryProposedByAuthor |
P114494
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conformal cyclic cosmology |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conformal cyclic cosmology | Statement: [Cycles of Time, theoryProposedByAuthor, conformal cyclic cosmology]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theoryProposedByAuthor Context triple: [Cycles of Time, theoryProposedByAuthor, conformal cyclic cosmology]
-
A.
thesisOf
Indicates that a particular work is the thesis authored by a specified person or associated with a specified degree or institution.
-
B.
coProposedBy
Indicates that a proposal, idea, or item is jointly put forward or suggested by multiple entities together.
-
C.
hasTheory
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular theory.
-
D.
hasAuthorIdea
Indicates that an author is associated with or responsible for originating a particular idea.
-
E.
hasAuthorOf
Indicates that one entity is the author or creator of another entity (such as a work, document, or publication).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822d9c0408190b9a2b3643e58bb4d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de94e25a2481908b8394e9a19f3b64 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c4ccba08190a988bfda0bc9f5cb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:25 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de5fb4de14819092acdecbd201d672 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:21 a.m.