Triple
T14504307
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eastern Romania |
E340223
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Focșani |
E560879
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Focșani | Statement: [Eastern Romania, hasCity, Focșani]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Focșani Context triple: [Eastern Romania, hasCity, Focșani]
-
A.
Focșani
chosen
Focșani is a city in eastern Romania, historically part of the Moldavia–Wallachia border region and known as a regional cultural and administrative center.
-
B.
Târgu Frumos
Târgu Frumos is a small town in northeastern Romania, known as a local commercial and transit center within Iași County in the historical region of Moldavia.
-
C.
Băilești
Băilești is a town in southwestern Romania, in Dolj County, known as a local agricultural and commercial center.
-
D.
Râmnicu Vâlcea
Râmnicu Vâlcea is a city in south-central Romania, located on the Olt River and serving as the capital of Vâlcea County.
-
E.
Câmpulung Moldovenesc
Câmpulung Moldovenesc is a town in northeastern Romania’s Bukovina region, known for its surrounding Carpathian mountain landscapes and traditional Moldavian culture.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822d9c0408190b9a2b3643e58bb4d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de94e25a2481908b8394e9a19f3b64 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff99742618819083bba63ce9f27895 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:21 a.m.