Triple
T14480812
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Erastes |
E359096
|
entity |
| Predicate | expectedToExhibit |
P32577
|
FINISHED |
| Object | arete |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: arete | Statement: [Erastes, expectedToExhibit, arete]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: expectedToExhibit Context triple: [Erastes, expectedToExhibit, arete]
-
A.
anticipates
Indicates that one entity expects or predicts a future event, action, or state involving another entity before it actually occurs.
-
B.
expectedBenefit
Indicates the benefit or positive outcome that is anticipated to result from a particular action, decision, or relationship between entities.
-
C.
isSupposedToBe
chosen
Indicates that something is expected or intended to have a particular state, quality, or role, whether or not it actually does.
-
D.
expectedDuty
Indicates that one entity is obligated or anticipated to perform a particular duty or responsibility toward another entity or within a given context.
-
E.
predictedEffect
Indicates that one entity is expected to cause, influence, or result in a particular outcome or consequence for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d827966698819082e140837737501d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de924a576c819098351efabdb779b1 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c487b4c819097803e58dca628a5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:20 a.m.