Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Federal Rule of Evidence 804 | Statement: [Federal Rule of Evidence 807, relatedTo, Federal Rule of Evidence 804]

Target entity: Federal Rule of Evidence 804
Context triple: [Federal Rule of Evidence 807, relatedTo, Federal Rule of Evidence 804]

• A. Rule 804 chosen
  Rule 804 is a provision in the Federal Rules of Evidence that sets out specific hearsay exceptions applicable when the declarant is unavailable to testify.
• B. Federal Rule of Evidence 801
  Federal Rule of Evidence 801 is a key U.S. evidentiary rule that defines what constitutes hearsay and sets out the basic framework for determining when out-of-court statements are treated as hearsay in federal courts.
• C. Federal Rule of Evidence 806
  Federal Rule of Evidence 806 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that governs how and when a hearsay declarant’s credibility may be attacked or supported as if the declarant had testified in court.
• D. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
  Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
• E. Rule 608 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
  Rule 608 of the Federal Rules of Evidence governs how a witness’s character for truthfulness may be attacked or supported, including the use of opinion, reputation, and certain specific instances of conduct.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.