Triple
T14477944
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | On Nature |
E359022
|
entity |
| Predicate | claim2 |
P4932
|
FINISHED |
| Object | if anything exists, it cannot be known |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: if anything exists, it cannot be known | Statement: [On Nature, claim2, if anything exists, it cannot be known]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claim2 Context triple: [On Nature, claim2, if anything exists, it cannot be known]
-
A.
claimed
Indicates that an entity has asserted or stated something as true, often without definitive proof or verification.
-
B.
claimedSee
Indicates that one entity asserted or reported having seen or visually perceived another entity or event.
-
C.
claimedRight
Indicates that an entity asserts or demands a right or entitlement in relation to another entity or resource.
-
D.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
E.
mainClaim
chosen
Indicates that one statement is presented as the central or primary assertion being made about a topic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d827966698819082e140837737501d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de9248edb48190a74eb032aeaac027 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c487b4c819097803e58dca628a5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:20 a.m.