Triple

T14460052
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Faustian pact E358557 entity
Predicate typicalGainType P114735 FINISHED
Object power LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: power | Statement: [Faustian pact, typicalGainType, power]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalGainType
Context triple: [Faustian pact, typicalGainType, power]
  • A. typicalSegmentType
    Indicates that something is classified as belonging to a usual or characteristic type of segment within a broader structure or sequence.
  • B. typicalPower
    Indicates the usual or characteristic amount of power associated with an entity under normal operating conditions.
  • C. typicalUnitType
    Indicates that one entity is the standard or commonly used unit type associated with measuring or expressing the other entity.
  • D. typicalDimension
    Indicates that one entity represents a standard or characteristic measurement (such as size, length, or capacity) typically associated with another entity.
  • E. typicalMeasure
    Indicates the standard or characteristic quantitative measure typically associated with something, such as its usual size, weight, duration, or other magnitude.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d82794dfa081909b9134ad2e32244b completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de91abc1008190a19de4f8f0112c9d completed April 14, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de5c42bd3c81909a62acf30cc24d1e completed April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de610330a48190b558235a14c0dc9f completed April 14, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:19 a.m.