Triple
T1445351
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund |
E31163
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimantsInclude |
P28688
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal agencies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal agencies | Statement: [Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, claimantsInclude, federal agencies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimantsInclude Context triple: [Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, claimantsInclude, federal agencies]
-
A.
claimsToFollow
Indicates that one entity asserts or professes adherence to the principles, rules, or leadership of another entity.
-
B.
CanadaClaimsAs
Indicates that Canada asserts ownership, sovereignty, or jurisdiction over the referenced entity or territory.
-
C.
claimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity asserts it can provide a clarification, account, or understanding of another entity or phenomenon.
-
D.
claimsToModify
Indicates that one entity asserts it can change, alter, or adjust another entity or its properties.
-
E.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4991633388190a4d61b5a98aa407a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c55714588190a95b4f677c21cbaa |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c47a840c819083307a65c027a19e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4c55508948190922aee3230a4323e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.