Triple
T14444555
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kentucky Supreme Court |
E358168
|
entity |
| Predicate | finalAuthorityOver |
P55088
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interpretation of Kentucky law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interpretation of Kentucky law | Statement: [Kentucky Supreme Court, finalAuthorityOver, interpretation of Kentucky law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: finalAuthorityOver Context triple: [Kentucky Supreme Court, finalAuthorityOver, interpretation of Kentucky law]
-
A.
reservesUltimateAuthorityTo
Indicates that one party retains the highest level of decision-making power and final control over another party, process, or domain, even if some authority is delegated.
-
B.
finalRuler
Indicates that an entity is the last or ultimate ruler of another entity, with no subsequent rulers following.
-
C.
indicatesAuthorityOver
Indicates that one entity holds recognized power, control, or decision-making authority over another entity.
-
D.
authorityAffirmedBy
Indicates that the legitimacy or validity of an authority is confirmed, endorsed, or supported by another party or source.
-
E.
isFinalArbiterOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity has ultimate, authoritative decision-making power over another entity or over a particular matter, with no further appeal beyond that entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d82794dfa081909b9134ad2e32244b |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de915e76f481909fe9462f964b5b1c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c3a02fc819097373f97a260cdeb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:19 a.m.