Triple
T14441280
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anynet+ |
E358086
|
entity |
| Predicate | controlsOver |
P30853
|
FINISHED |
| Object | HDMI-CEC protocol |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: HDMI-CEC protocol | Statement: [Anynet+, controlsOver, HDMI-CEC protocol]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: controlsOver Context triple: [Anynet+, controlsOver, HDMI-CEC protocol]
-
A.
controlsWith
Indicates that one entity exercises authority, direction, or regulatory power over another entity through specific means or mechanisms.
-
B.
exportControl
Indicates that an entity is subject to rules or restrictions governing the transfer or export of goods, services, or information across borders.
-
C.
controlsType
Indicates that one entity has authority over, or the ability to direct or regulate, the type or category of another entity.
-
D.
expandedControlOver
Indicates that one entity has increased or broadened authority, influence, or power over another entity or domain compared to a prior state.
-
E.
canControl
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the ability or authority to direct, manage, or influence the behavior or state of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8279402a88190821ffa39ae15bccf |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de914c1398819090fa2a74d257ba3e |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c3a02fc819097373f97a260cdeb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:18 a.m.