Triple
T14429470
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lemgo |
E357782
|
entity |
| Predicate | twinTown |
P1072
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bourges |
E206721
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bourges | Statement: [Lemgo, twinTown, Bourges]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bourges Context triple: [Lemgo, twinTown, Bourges]
-
A.
Bourges
chosen
Bourges is a historic city in central France known for its well-preserved medieval architecture and its UNESCO-listed Gothic cathedral, Saint-Étienne.
-
B.
Blois
Blois is a historic city in central France known for its Renaissance château, picturesque setting on the Loire River, and rich royal heritage.
-
C.
Chapeauroux
Chapeauroux is a river in central France that flows through the Massif Central before joining the Allier.
-
D.
Mâcon
Mâcon is a historic town in eastern France’s Burgundy region, known for its wine production and picturesque setting along the Saône River.
-
E.
Pithiviers
Pithiviers is a small town in north-central France known for its historical architecture and traditional French pastries.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8279402a88190821ffa39ae15bccf |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de91154de881909266ae88d1545685 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:10 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffa11c81f481909129eef69e47d079 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:18 a.m.