Triple

T14426552
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bjarni Herjólfsson E357711 entity
Predicate inspiredVoyage P114230 FINISHED
Object Leif Erikson’s expedition to Vinland LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Leif Erikson’s expedition to Vinland | Statement: [Bjarni Herjólfsson, inspiredVoyage, Leif Erikson’s expedition to Vinland]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inspiredVoyage
Context triple: [Bjarni Herjólfsson, inspiredVoyage, Leif Erikson’s expedition to Vinland]
  • A. voyageOn
    Indicates that an entity is traveling or being transported aboard a particular vessel or means of sea (or space) travel.
  • B. voyageWith
    Indicates that two or more entities travel together on the same journey or trip, sharing a common route or voyage.
  • C. sponsoredVoyagesOf
    Indicates that one entity provided financial or logistical support for the voyages undertaken by another entity.
  • D. famousVoyage
    Indicates that a voyage is widely recognized or celebrated for its historical, cultural, or exploratory significance.
  • E. subsequentVoyage
    Indicates that one voyage occurs after and in sequence to another voyage in time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8279402a88190821ffa39ae15bccf completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de911398f08190be85bc0a8bef6b1b completed April 14, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de5c30467881908e770e3940295641 completed April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de5fb4de14819092acdecbd201d672 completed April 14, 2026, 3:39 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:18 a.m.