Triple
T14423423
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blink (fictional character or concept) |
E357637
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAmbiguousIdentity |
P114208
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Blink (fictional character or concept), hasAmbiguousIdentity, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAmbiguousIdentity Context triple: [Blink (fictional character or concept), hasAmbiguousIdentity, true]
-
A.
hasIdentity
Indicates that one entity is the same as, or is identified as, another specific entity or identifier.
-
B.
hasMultipleIdentities
Indicates that a single entity is associated with more than one distinct identity or persona.
-
C.
hasDistinctIdentity
Indicates that an entity possesses its own unique, distinguishable identity separate from other entities.
-
D.
hasNotableIdentity
Indicates that an entity is recognized for a specific, distinguished role, status, or identity that makes it notable.
-
E.
hasHyphenatedIdentity
Indicates that an entity possesses a compound or dual identity expressed as a hyphenated combination of distinct identity components.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d82793421c8190861eb0e673b085de |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de91123f848190ba3fb18a76c2d24c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c30467881908e770e3940295641 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de5fb4de14819092acdecbd201d672 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:18 a.m.