Triple
T14416028
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Davos Seaworth |
E357451
|
entity |
| Predicate | counselsAgainst |
P2184
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sacrifice of innocents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sacrifice of innocents | Statement: [Davos Seaworth, counselsAgainst, sacrifice of innocents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: counselsAgainst Context triple: [Davos Seaworth, counselsAgainst, sacrifice of innocents]
-
A.
advocatesAgainst
Indicates that one entity actively opposes, argues against, or campaigns to prevent or stop another entity, action, or idea.
-
B.
advises
Indicates that one entity provides guidance, recommendations, or counsel to another entity.
-
C.
opposedBy
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
D.
discourages
chosen
Indicates an action or influence that deters, dissuades, or reduces the likelihood of someone performing a particular behavior or pursuing a certain outcome.
-
E.
disapprovedOf
Indicates that one entity holds a negative judgment or lack of approval toward another entity or that entity’s actions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d82793421c8190861eb0e673b085de |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de90cc99208190a2313b1acfb5d802 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de5c30467881908e770e3940295641 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:17 a.m.