Triple

T14403470
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Christina Drayton E357131 entity
Predicate confrontsIssue P13650 FINISHED
Object daughter's engagement to a Black man LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: daughter's engagement to a Black man | Statement: [Christina Drayton, confrontsIssue, daughter's engagement to a Black man]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confrontsIssue
Context triple: [Christina Drayton, confrontsIssue, daughter's engagement to a Black man]
  • A. confronts
    Indicates that one entity directly faces and challenges another, often in opposition or dispute.
  • B. facingIssue chosen
    Indicates that an entity is currently experiencing, encountering, or dealing with a problem, difficulty, or obstacle.
  • C. involvesIssue
    Indicates that an action, event, or entity is related to, concerns, or includes a particular issue.
  • D. helpsCharacterConfront
    Indicates that one character actively supports or enables another character in facing and dealing with a difficult issue, fear, or challenge.
  • E. addressedConflictWith
    Indicates that one entity has taken action to confront, manage, or resolve a conflict involving another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d827927c988190ad98bb0360981783 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de90860ae481908e175decda8624d5 completed April 14, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2aa024c48190805df6a9d63deb10 completed April 14, 2026, 11:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:17 a.m.