Triple

T14392298
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Metapatterns: Across Space, Time, and Mind E356873 entity
Predicate hasMetapattern P114067 FINISHED
Object spheres LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: spheres | Statement: [Metapatterns: Across Space, Time, and Mind, hasMetapattern, spheres]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMetapattern
Context triple: [Metapatterns: Across Space, Time, and Mind, hasMetapattern, spheres]
  • A. hasMetaSubject
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject at a meta-level, such as the topic, theme, or aboutness of the entity rather than its direct content or participants.
  • B. hasMet
    Indicates that one entity has encountered or come into contact with another entity at least once.
  • C. hasPattern
    Indicates that one entity exhibits, follows, or is characterized by a specific recurring form, structure, or design defined by another entity.
  • D. hasUsePattern
    Indicates a characteristic or recurring way in which something is typically used or applied.
  • E. hasPlanningPattern
    Indicates that an entity follows or is associated with a particular planning pattern or structured approach to planning.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d827927c988190ad98bb0360981783 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de902b9acc8190817ffa848a76a880 completed April 14, 2026, 7:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2aa024c48190805df6a9d63deb10 completed April 14, 2026, 11:53 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de2e08b6c08190bb4c929deab236a6 completed April 14, 2026, 12:07 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:16 a.m.