Triple
T14377992
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sámi languages |
E356523
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMemberLanguage |
P7390
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kemi Sámi |
E1047470
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kemi Sámi | Statement: [Sámi languages, hasMemberLanguage, Kemi Sámi]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kemi Sámi Context triple: [Sámi languages, hasMemberLanguage, Kemi Sámi]
-
A.
Kemi Sámi
chosen
Kemi Sámi is an extinct Eastern Sámi language once spoken in parts of northern Finland.
-
B.
Inari Sámi
Inari Sámi is a Uralic minority language spoken primarily around Lake Inari in northern Finland by the Inari Sámi people.
-
C.
Pite Sámi
Pite Sámi is an endangered Uralic language traditionally spoken by the Sámi people in the Arjeplog area of northern Sweden.
-
D.
Babinsky Sámi
Babinsky Sámi is an extinct Eastern Sámi language variety that was once spoken in parts of the Kola Peninsula in Russia.
-
E.
Lule Sámi
Lule Sámi is a Uralic, Indigenous Sámi language spoken primarily in northern Sweden and Norway.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8279163a081908aec45c0e3f1e02f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de900a67e08190ab1dcf36e6bb3405 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd648135188190af86b1b2be2fe0e0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:16 a.m.