Triple
T1437419
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rajputana Agency |
E30587
|
entity |
| Predicate | includedState |
P11085
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Tonk State
Tonk State was a princely state in British India, notable for being one of the few Muslim-ruled states in the largely Rajput-dominated region of present-day Rajasthan.
|
E211322
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tonk State | Statement: [Rajputana Agency, includedState, Tonk State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tonk State Context triple: [Rajputana Agency, includedState, Tonk State]
-
A.
Alwar State
Alwar State was a princely state in northern India, ruled by Rajput princes and later integrated into the modern state of Rajasthan after Indian independence.
-
B.
Morvi State
Morvi State was a former princely state in western India, historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
-
C.
Virpur State
Virpur State was a former princely state in western India historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
-
D.
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh is a state in central India known for its rich mineral resources, dense forests, tribal cultures, and growing industrial and power sectors.
-
E.
Dhrol State
Dhrol State was a former princely state in western India historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Tonk State Triple: [Rajputana Agency, includedState, Tonk State]
Generated description
Tonk State was a princely state in British India, notable for being one of the few Muslim-ruled states in the largely Rajput-dominated region of present-day Rajasthan.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tonk State Target entity description: Tonk State was a princely state in British India, notable for being one of the few Muslim-ruled states in the largely Rajput-dominated region of present-day Rajasthan.
-
A.
Alwar State
Alwar State was a princely state in northern India, ruled by Rajput princes and later integrated into the modern state of Rajasthan after Indian independence.
-
B.
Morvi State
Morvi State was a former princely state in western India, historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
-
C.
Virpur State
Virpur State was a former princely state in western India historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
-
D.
Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh is a state in central India known for its rich mineral resources, dense forests, tribal cultures, and growing industrial and power sectors.
-
E.
Dhrol State
Dhrol State was a former princely state in western India historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498fc69ec8190b61722bd4b67c4d2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c5059ef88190af20e796acdb2058 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69adeabbc9588190880996e549b8bd7a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69adeb6e8fe08190a4732d42aa15ee8e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69adebea03a08190bd055e3e6460b5f4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.