Triple
T14373966
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Great Characters Edition Enzo Ferrari |
E356425
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCap |
P113792
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Great Characters Edition Enzo Ferrari, hasCap, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCap Context triple: [Great Characters Edition Enzo Ferrari, hasCap, yes]
-
A.
isCapableOf
Indicates that an entity has the ability or capacity to perform a particular action or function.
-
B.
hasCape
Indicates that one entity possesses or is wearing a cape.
-
C.
hasPower
Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
-
D.
hasCP
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a specific CP (such as a control point, contact person, or configuration parameter), depending on the domain context.
-
E.
hasCapacityTo
Indicates that one entity possesses the ability, power, or potential to perform an action or bring about a particular effect in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8279163a081908aec45c0e3f1e02f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de9007184c8190aebb003cb6548cc8 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de2a9cb3e081909f6b33fdd939bb9e |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:53 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de2e07d1f88190bdcd20967e484718 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:15 a.m.