Triple

T14373588
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dior Watches E356414 entity
Predicate usesBrandingElement P48662 FINISHED
Object Dior logo LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dior logo | Statement: [Dior Watches, usesBrandingElement, Dior logo]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesBrandingElement
Context triple: [Dior Watches, usesBrandingElement, Dior logo]
  • A. hasBranding
    Indicates that one entity carries, displays, or is associated with the brand identity of another entity.
  • B. hasBrandIdentityElement chosen
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific component of its overall brand identity (such as a logo, color scheme, or tagline).
  • C. usesBrandCharacter
    Indicates that one entity employs or features another entity’s brand character (such as a mascot or branded persona) in its materials, products, or communications.
  • D. usesBrandColor
    Indicates that one entity applies or displays another entity’s official brand color in its appearance, design, or materials.
  • E. sharesBrandingWith
    Indicates that two entities use the same or closely related branding elements, such as name, logo, or visual identity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8279163a081908aec45c0e3f1e02f completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de9007184c8190aebb003cb6548cc8 completed April 14, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a9cb3e081909f6b33fdd939bb9e completed April 14, 2026, 11:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:15 a.m.