Triple

T14353250
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Massachusetts state flag E355905 entity
Predicate previousReverseDesign P113902 FINISHED
Object green pine tree on white field LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: green pine tree on white field | Statement: [Massachusetts state flag, previousReverseDesign, green pine tree on white field]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousReverseDesign
Context triple: [Massachusetts state flag, previousReverseDesign, green pine tree on white field]
  • A. reverseDesigns
    Indicates that one entity creates or specifies designs that are the reverse or inverse configuration of another entity’s designs.
  • B. pairedWithReverseDesign
    Indicates that an entity is associated with another entity that represents its reverse or opposite design counterpart.
  • C. reverseDesignSubject
    Indicates that the subject is the entity for which a design or plan is derived by reversing or backtracking from an existing outcome or artifact.
  • D. reverseDesignElement
    Indicates that one design element is the reverse or inverse counterpart of another design element.
  • E. reverseDesigner
    Indicates that one entity is the designer or creator of another entity, with the direction of the relationship reversed from a primary “designer” predicate.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d82790a7e08190877e2d349b2e8d8e completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de8f4ff1e48190bd9419d70098cede completed April 14, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a9958e881909d03ac03f135163e completed April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de2e8a40e4819080240c874da1842c completed April 14, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:14 a.m.