Triple
T1435106
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Smith |
E30542
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedOccupation |
P2374
|
FINISHED |
| Object | blacksmith |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: blacksmith | Statement: [Smith, associatedOccupation, blacksmith]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedOccupation Context triple: [Smith, associatedOccupation, blacksmith]
-
A.
subjectOccupation
chosen
Indicates that the subject holds or performs a particular job, profession, or role as their occupation.
-
B.
representedOccupation
Indicates that one entity has served as an official or formal representative of another entity’s occupation or professional role.
-
C.
requiredOccupationOf
Indicates that one entity specifies the occupation or job role that is required or expected for another entity (such as a position, task, or qualification).
-
D.
relatedProfession
Indicates that two entities have professions that are connected or associated in some meaningful way, such as being in the same field, industry, or professional domain.
-
E.
derivesFromOccupation
Indicates that one entity originates from, is obtained through, or is a result of another entity’s occupation or professional role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498fc69ec8190b61722bd4b67c4d2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c5ff8dbc81909eafcfc9f2260a22 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c478f65481909ee716791c663491 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.