Triple

T14350575
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sour Soul E355839 entity
Predicate featuresLiveInstrumentation P113893 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Sour Soul, featuresLiveInstrumentation, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresLiveInstrumentation
Context triple: [Sour Soul, featuresLiveInstrumentation, true]
  • A. coreInstrument
    Indicates that an instrument plays a central or primary role in performing an action or achieving an outcome.
  • B. typicalInstrumentation
    Indicates the usual or standard set of instruments commonly associated with performing or realizing something (such as a work, genre, or piece).
  • C. enablingInstrument
    Indicates that one entity serves as the means, tool, or instrument that enables another entity’s action or effect to occur.
  • D. featuresRhythm
    Indicates that something includes, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or structure.
  • E. supportsDynamicInstrumentation
    Indicates that an entity is capable of being instrumented or monitored at runtime without requiring recompilation or restart.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d82790a7e08190877e2d349b2e8d8e completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de8f4e1e588190bdc7aaf7a2819948 completed April 14, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a9958e881909d03ac03f135163e completed April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de2e8a40e4819080240c874da1842c completed April 14, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:14 a.m.