Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: National Audubon Society v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles | Statement: [Mono Lake water rights litigation, relatedCase, National Audubon Society v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles]

Target entity: National Audubon Society v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles
Context triple: [Mono Lake water rights litigation, relatedCase, National Audubon Society v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles]

• A. National Audubon Society v. Superior Court chosen
  National Audubon Society v. Superior Court is a landmark California Supreme Court case that established the application of the public trust doctrine to limit water diversions affecting Mono Lake and other navigable waters.
• B. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
  Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.
• C. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
  Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
• D. Ex parte Young
  Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
• E. City of Boerne v. Flores
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.