Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: National Audubon Society v. Superior Court | Statement: [Mono Lake water rights litigation, relatedCase, National Audubon Society v. Superior Court]

Target entity: National Audubon Society v. Superior Court
Context triple: [Mono Lake water rights litigation, relatedCase, National Audubon Society v. Superior Court]

• A. Kivalina v. ExxonMobil
  Kivalina v. ExxonMobil is a landmark U.S. climate change lawsuit in which an Alaskan village sued major energy companies for damages allegedly caused by global warming and resulting coastal erosion.
• B. Ex parte Young
  Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
• C. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana
  Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Montana’s higher elk-hunting license fees for nonresidents and narrowed the scope of the Privileges and Immunities Clause to exclude purely recreational activities.
• D. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
  Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal agencies’ obligations under NEPA, holding that the Act requires thorough environmental impact analysis but not the adoption of any particular mitigation measures.
• E. City of Boerne v. Flores
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: National Audubon Society v. Superior Court
Triple: [Mono Lake water rights litigation, relatedCase, National Audubon Society v. Superior Court]

National Audubon Society v. Superior Court is a landmark California Supreme Court case that established the application of the public trust doctrine to limit water diversions affecting Mono Lake and other navigable waters.

Target entity: National Audubon Society v. Superior Court
Target entity description: National Audubon Society v. Superior Court is a landmark California Supreme Court case that established the application of the public trust doctrine to limit water diversions affecting Mono Lake and other navigable waters.

• A. Kivalina v. ExxonMobil
  Kivalina v. ExxonMobil is a landmark U.S. climate change lawsuit in which an Alaskan village sued major energy companies for damages allegedly caused by global warming and resulting coastal erosion.
• B. Ex parte Young
  Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
• C. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana
  Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Montana’s higher elk-hunting license fees for nonresidents and narrowed the scope of the Privileges and Immunities Clause to exclude purely recreational activities.
• D. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
  Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal agencies’ obligations under NEPA, holding that the Act requires thorough environmental impact analysis but not the adoption of any particular mitigation measures.
• E. City of Boerne v. Flores
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• F. None of above. chosen