Triple
T1431878
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central–Eastern Oceanic languages |
E30464
|
entity |
| Predicate | reconstructableFrom |
P4143
|
FINISHED |
| Object | comparative method in historical linguistics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comparative method in historical linguistics | Statement: [Central–Eastern Oceanic languages, reconstructableFrom, comparative method in historical linguistics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reconstructableFrom Context triple: [Central–Eastern Oceanic languages, reconstructableFrom, comparative method in historical linguistics]
-
A.
reconstructedAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity has been rebuilt, recreated, or inferred based on evidence, models, or partial information from another entity.
-
B.
reconstructionFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a reconstruction, restoration, or rebuilt version of another entity.
-
C.
reconstructedIn
Indicates that something has been rebuilt, restored, or re-created within a particular context, location, or medium.
-
D.
canBeConstructedWith
Indicates that one entity can be formed, built, or assembled using another entity as material, components, or means.
-
E.
reconstructedAfter
Indicates that one entity has been rebuilt, restored, or reassembled following the occurrence or existence of another entity or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498fc69ec8190b61722bd4b67c4d2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c500a9888190a16fbb1ec97a79c9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c4771c9481908ae47c959debbe77 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.