Triple
T14317394
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | West reporters |
E354991
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleInLaw |
P41321
|
FINISHED |
| Object | primary authority for reported decisions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: primary authority for reported decisions | Statement: [West reporters, roleInLaw, primary authority for reported decisions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInLaw Context triple: [West reporters, roleInLaw, primary authority for reported decisions]
-
A.
legalProfessionRole
Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific professional role within the legal domain in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
legalSystemRole
chosen
Indicates the specific function, capacity, or position an entity holds within a legal or judicial system.
-
C.
legalCaseRole
Indicates the specific role or capacity an entity holds within a legal case, such as plaintiff, defendant, judge, or attorney.
-
D.
roleAtCourt
Indicates the specific position, function, or status an entity holds within a court or courtly setting.
-
E.
roleInInternationalLaw
Indicates that an entity holds a specific function, capacity, or status within the framework, institutions, or processes of international law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de8838e45c819080ee69dd39e3bd43 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de2a9515f4819081aabf251bca5878 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:13 a.m.