Triple
T14312310
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rule 609 |
E354862
|
entity |
| Predicate | authority |
P1330
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court of the United States (promulgation of Federal Rules of Evidence) |
E582506
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of the United States (promulgation of Federal Rules of Evidence) | Statement: [Rule 609, authority, Supreme Court of the United States (promulgation of Federal Rules of Evidence)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court of the United States (promulgation of Federal Rules of Evidence) Context triple: [Rule 609, authority, Supreme Court of the United States (promulgation of Federal Rules of Evidence)]
-
A.
rules of evidence for the federal courts
The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
-
B.
Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
-
C.
Washington Rules of Evidence
The Washington Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Washington State courts.
-
D.
Supreme Court of the United States (rulemaking under the Rules Enabling Act)
chosen
The Supreme Court of the United States, acting under its rulemaking authority granted by the Rules Enabling Act, promulgates and amends the federal procedural rules that govern practice in the federal courts.
-
E.
Organic Law of the Judicial Power of the Federation
The Organic Law of the Judicial Power of the Federation is a fundamental Mexican statute that structures, regulates, and organizes the federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court and other federal courts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd3d3124488190b2ea35949294e297 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.