Triple
T14312059
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rule 405 |
E354855
|
entity |
| Predicate | distinguishedFrom |
P1612
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rule 404 (which governs admissibility of character evidence) |
E354854
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rule 404 (which governs admissibility of character evidence) | Statement: [Rule 405, distinguishedFrom, Rule 404 (which governs admissibility of character evidence)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rule 404 (which governs admissibility of character evidence) Context triple: [Rule 405, distinguishedFrom, Rule 404 (which governs admissibility of character evidence)]
-
A.
Rule 404
chosen
Rule 404 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that generally prohibits using a person’s character or prior bad acts to prove they acted in conformity with that character on a particular occasion, subject to limited exceptions.
-
B.
Rule 804
Rule 804 is a provision in the Federal Rules of Evidence that sets out specific hearsay exceptions applicable when the declarant is unavailable to testify.
-
C.
Rule 403
Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
-
D.
Rule 44
Rule 44 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs the right to and appointment of counsel for defendants in federal criminal cases, including issues of joint representation and potential conflicts of interest.
-
E.
Rule 609
Rule 609 is a provision of the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that governs when a witness’s prior criminal convictions may be used to challenge their credibility in court.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd3d3124488190b2ea35949294e297 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.