Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence | Statement: [Rule 405, relatedTo, Rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence]

Target entity: Rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
Context triple: [Rule 405, relatedTo, Rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence]

• A. Rule 404 chosen
  Rule 404 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that generally prohibits using a person’s character or prior bad acts to prove they acted in conformity with that character on a particular occasion, subject to limited exceptions.
• B. Rule 804
  Rule 804 is a provision in the Federal Rules of Evidence that sets out specific hearsay exceptions applicable when the declarant is unavailable to testify.
• C. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
  Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
• D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
• E. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.