Triple

T14312045
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rule 405 E354855 entity
Predicate locatedInDocument P1637 FINISHED
Object Federal Rules of Evidence, Article IV E13641 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence, Article IV | Statement: [Rule 405, locatedInDocument, Federal Rules of Evidence, Article IV]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence, Article IV
Context triple: [Rule 405, locatedInDocument, Federal Rules of Evidence, Article IV]
  • A. rules of evidence for the federal courts chosen
    The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
  • B. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
    Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 completed April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fd3d3124488190b2ea35949294e297 completed May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.