Triple

T14311832
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Erie doctrine E354850 entity
Predicate hasComponentTest P113722 FINISHED
Object outcome-determinative test LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: outcome-determinative test | Statement: [Erie doctrine, hasComponentTest, outcome-determinative test]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasComponentTest
Context triple: [Erie doctrine, hasComponentTest, outcome-determinative test]
  • A. hasSubcomponent
    Indicates that one entity is a constituent part or component of another, larger entity.
  • B. hasComponentProgram
    Indicates that one program includes or is composed of another program as a component or sub-program.
  • C. hasComponentModel
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific component model as part of its structure or configuration.
  • D. hasComponentCurrent
    Indicates that an entity currently includes or contains a specific component as part of its present composition or structure.
  • E. hasComponentGroup
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific group of components treated as a single unit.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 completed April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a8f81f08190af737e1654847aa6 completed April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de2e07d1f88190bdcd20967e484718 completed April 14, 2026, 12:07 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.