Triple
T14311826
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Erie doctrine |
E354850
|
entity |
| Predicate | clarifiedByCase |
P13052
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co. |
E354849
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co. | Statement: [Erie doctrine, clarifiedByCase, Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co. Context triple: [Erie doctrine, clarifiedByCase, Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.]
-
A.
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co.
chosen
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the conflict between federal procedural rules and state laws limiting class actions in federal diversity jurisdiction.
-
B.
Wilkins v. Gaddy
Wilkins v. Gaddy is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying that the core inquiry in Eighth Amendment excessive force claims is the nature of the force used rather than the extent of the inmate’s injury.
-
C.
Groves v. Slaughter
Groves v. Slaughter was an 1841 U.S. Supreme Court case under the Taney Court that addressed state power to restrict the importation of enslaved people and the limits of the Commerce Clause.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Grovey v. Townsend
Grovey v. Townsend was a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule, later repudiated as unconstitutional racial discrimination in voting.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd3d3124488190b2ea35949294e297 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.