Triple
T14311823
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Erie doctrine |
E354850
|
entity |
| Predicate | clarifiedByCase |
P13052
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. |
E1091406
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. | Statement: [Erie doctrine, clarifiedByCase, Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. Context triple: [Erie doctrine, clarifiedByCase, Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.]
-
A.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
chosen
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the Erie doctrine by emphasizing the role of federal interests and the Seventh Amendment jury trial right in determining whether federal courts must follow state procedural rules in diversity cases.
-
B.
United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co. is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly broadened the federal government’s authority to regulate non-navigable waterways under the Commerce Clause.
-
C.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co. was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down federal regulation of coal production as an unconstitutional overreach of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers.
-
D.
Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision best known for Justice Brandeis’s articulation of the “Ashwander rules,” which limit the Court’s exercise of judicial review and emphasize constitutional avoidance.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd4684e2648190b46328252ac9d51b |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.