Triple
T1431107
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Lowestoft |
E30447
|
entity |
| Predicate | fleetStrengthEnglish |
P28429
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 100 ships |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 100 ships | Statement: [Battle of Lowestoft, fleetStrengthEnglish, approximately 100 ships]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fleetStrengthEnglish Context triple: [Battle of Lowestoft, fleetStrengthEnglish, approximately 100 ships]
-
A.
navalForceComposition
Indicates the makeup and distribution of different types of naval units or vessels within a particular naval force.
-
B.
navalVesselsAlliedApprox
Indicates that two or more naval vessels are approximately allied, suggesting a cooperative or friendly relationship without specifying a precise or formal alliance.
-
C.
navalFleet
Indicates a relationship where multiple naval vessels are organized and operate together as a coordinated maritime military force.
-
D.
fleetCommander (British)
Indicates that the subject serves as the fleet commander for the British naval forces.
-
E.
navalPowerStatus
Indicates the relative strength, capability, or strategic standing of an entity’s naval forces compared to others or to defined benchmarks.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498fc69ec8190b61722bd4b67c4d2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c500a9888190a16fbb1ec97a79c9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c4771c9481908ae47c959debbe77 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4c4feea448190b2b5071b28a5b608 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.