Triple

T14309918
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Committee Room 4 E354798 entity
Predicate audioVisualSupport P48651 FINISHED
Object committee broadcasting systems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: committee broadcasting systems | Statement: [Committee Room 4, audioVisualSupport, committee broadcasting systems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: audioVisualSupport
Context triple: [Committee Room 4, audioVisualSupport, committee broadcasting systems]
  • A. isAudioWorkForVisualWork
    Indicates that one work serves as the audio component or soundtrack specifically created for or associated with a particular visual work.
  • B. usesAudioFrom
    Indicates that one entity incorporates or relies on the audio content produced or provided by another entity.
  • C. depictsSound
    Indicates that one entity visually represents or portrays the sound produced by another entity.
  • D. hasAudioFeature chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific audio-related characteristic or property.
  • E. visualCompanion
    Indicates that one entity serves as a visual counterpart, partner, or accompanying element to another in a visual context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de85b26da48190a96e2f60ace51335 completed April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a8f81f08190af737e1654847aa6 completed April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.