Triple
T14309775
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blooming Grove, Dane County, Wisconsin |
E354794
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasName |
P744
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Blooming Grove |
E354794
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Blooming Grove | Statement: [Blooming Grove, Dane County, Wisconsin, hasName, Blooming Grove]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Blooming Grove Context triple: [Blooming Grove, Dane County, Wisconsin, hasName, Blooming Grove]
-
A.
Blooming Grove
chosen
Blooming Grove is a town in Dane County, Wisconsin, known for its suburban residential character near the city of Madison.
-
B.
Baum Grove
Baum Grove is a small neighborhood park and community green space located in the Shadyside area of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
-
C.
Vails Grove
Vails Grove is a small hamlet within the Town of Southeast in Putnam County, New York, known primarily as a residential lakeside community.
-
D.
Brights Grove
Brights Grove is a lakeside residential community and former village now forming part of the city of Sarnia in southwestern Ontario, Canada.
-
E.
River Grove
River Grove is a suburban village in Cook County, Illinois, located near Chicago and served by commuter rail transit.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de85b26da48190a96e2f60ace51335 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd4684e2648190b46328252ac9d51b |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.