Triple
T14298562
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States is real party in interest |
E354501
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedConcept |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
United States v. Cox
United States v. Cox is a 1965 U.S. federal appellate court case that addressed the limits of judicial power over prosecutorial discretion, holding that courts cannot compel a U.S. Attorney to sign an indictment.
|
E1091966
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Cox | Statement: [United States is real party in interest, relatedConcept, United States v. Cox]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Cox Context triple: [United States is real party in interest, relatedConcept, United States v. Cox]
-
A.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
B.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
-
C.
Printz v. United States
Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
-
D.
United States v. O'Brien
United States v. O'Brien is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a federal law banning the destruction of draft cards and established an important test for evaluating government regulation of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.
-
E.
United States v. Callender
United States v. Callender was a prominent 1800 Sedition Act prosecution of journalist James Thomson Callender that became historically significant for the controversial conduct of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase during the trial.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: United States v. Cox Triple: [United States is real party in interest, relatedConcept, United States v. Cox]
Generated description
United States v. Cox is a 1965 U.S. federal appellate court case that addressed the limits of judicial power over prosecutorial discretion, holding that courts cannot compel a U.S. Attorney to sign an indictment.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Cox Target entity description: United States v. Cox is a 1965 U.S. federal appellate court case that addressed the limits of judicial power over prosecutorial discretion, holding that courts cannot compel a U.S. Attorney to sign an indictment.
-
A.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
B.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
-
C.
Printz v. United States
Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
-
D.
United States v. O'Brien
United States v. O'Brien is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a federal law banning the destruction of draft cards and established an important test for evaluating government regulation of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.
-
E.
United States v. Callender
United States v. Callender was a prominent 1800 Sedition Act prosecution of journalist James Thomson Callender that became historically significant for the controversial conduct of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase during the trial.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278e17088190b328c5a9d4be74ff |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de717cfc948190ace5f1c91283b1c3 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd3d2697648190beade47df424a9e5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69fd41335b308190b1d49b214d5206a1 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:49 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69fd41fcd8b08190802e54e1c18b58e2 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:11 a.m.