Triple
T14293425
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona State Route 95 |
E354376
|
entity |
| Predicate | abbreviation |
P43
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
SR 95
SR 95 is a north–south Arizona state highway that runs largely along the Colorado River, serving communities and recreational areas in western Arizona.
|
E1097220
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SR 95 | Statement: [Arizona State Route 95, abbreviation, SR 95]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: SR 95 Context triple: [Arizona State Route 95, abbreviation, SR 95]
-
A.
SR 91
SR 91 is a state highway designation used for specific numbered routes within a U.S. state's road network.
-
B.
SR 92
SR 92 is a major east–west state highway in California that includes the San Mateo–Hayward Bridge across San Francisco Bay, connecting the Peninsula with the East Bay.
-
C.
SR 97
SR 97 is a state highway in Georgia that serves as a regional connector route through the southwestern part of the state.
-
D.
SR 9
SR 9 is a north–south state highway in Washington that runs through Snohomish and Skagit counties, serving as a parallel alternative to Interstate 5.
-
E.
SR 9
SR 9 is a primary state highway in Virginia that runs through the northern part of the state, connecting rural communities to the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: SR 95 Triple: [Arizona State Route 95, abbreviation, SR 95]
Generated description
SR 95 is a north–south Arizona state highway that runs largely along the Colorado River, serving communities and recreational areas in western Arizona.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: SR 95 Target entity description: SR 95 is a north–south Arizona state highway that runs largely along the Colorado River, serving communities and recreational areas in western Arizona.
-
A.
SR 91
SR 91 is a state highway designation used for specific numbered routes within a U.S. state's road network.
-
B.
SR 92
SR 92 is a major east–west state highway in California that includes the San Mateo–Hayward Bridge across San Francisco Bay, connecting the Peninsula with the East Bay.
-
C.
SR 97
SR 97 is a state highway in Georgia that serves as a regional connector route through the southwestern part of the state.
-
D.
SR 9
SR 9 is a north–south state highway in Washington that runs through Snohomish and Skagit counties, serving as a parallel alternative to Interstate 5.
-
E.
SR 9
SR 9 is a primary state highway in Virginia that runs through the northern part of the state, connecting rural communities to the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278e17088190b328c5a9d4be74ff |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de7179368081908117a9ccfbf94fd4 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd5504dc6c8190a4d8a5985632901d |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69fd569747708190b6cae2679cf9df89 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:20 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69fd5702e95481909f02440dbb233902 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:11 a.m.