Triple
T14278743
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gumatj |
E353986
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yolngu language |
C21827
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Yolngu language Context triple: [Gumatj, instanceOf, Yolngu language]
-
A.
Pama–Nyungan language
chosen
A Pama–Nyungan language is a member of the largest and most widespread family of Indigenous Australian languages, covering most of the Australian continent and sharing common structural and lexical features.
-
B.
Tasmanian Aboriginal language
A Tasmanian Aboriginal language is any of the now-extinct indigenous languages once spoken by the Aboriginal peoples of Tasmania, characterized by diverse dialects and limited surviving documentation.
-
C.
Papuan language
A Papuan language is any of the numerous non-Austronesian, non-Australian indigenous languages spoken primarily on the island of New Guinea and neighboring regions, representing several distinct and often unrelated language families.
-
D.
Ubangian language
A Ubangian language is a member of a proposed group of Central African languages, primarily spoken in the Central African Republic and neighboring countries, that share common phonological and grammatical features and are often considered a branch of the Niger-Congo family.
-
E.
Miwok language
The Miwok language is a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Miwok peoples of central California, known for their rich verb morphology and diverse dialects.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278d25148190abf1a8c8f5f533ad |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:10 a.m.