Triple

T1427780
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject S&P 500 ETFs E30371 entity
Predicate typicalExpenseRatio P28971 FINISHED
Object low relative to actively managed funds LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: low relative to actively managed funds | Statement: [S&P 500 ETFs, typicalExpenseRatio, low relative to actively managed funds]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalExpenseRatio
Context triple: [S&P 500 ETFs, typicalExpenseRatio, low relative to actively managed funds]
  • A. typicalTenantContribution
    Indicates the usual or standard amount that tenants are expected to contribute (e.g., toward rent, costs, or shared expenses) in a given rental arrangement.
  • B. typicalInvestmentSize
    Indicates the usual or most common amount of money invested in a single investment or deal.
  • C. creditPercentage
    Indicates the proportion or share of credit assigned to an entity in relation to a particular outcome, contribution, or transaction.
  • D. estimatedCost
    Indicates the predicted or calculated monetary amount expected to be required for something, such as a project, item, or action.
  • E. typicalAwardAmount
    Indicates the usual or most common amount of an award given in this relationship.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498fb823c8190a67ce4c4837e641a completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c52e4ed881908d85e0cb9fe851ac completed March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c4752abc8190a33b634c4d6fad28 completed March 1, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c52bbb748190aaa804438d31f4c2 completed March 1, 2026, 11 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.