Triple

T14267724
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Greg Hirsch E353691 entity
Predicate hasOnScreenDynamic P113500 FINISHED
Object mentor-mentee relationship with Tom Wambsgans LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mentor-mentee relationship with Tom Wambsgans | Statement: [Greg Hirsch, hasOnScreenDynamic, mentor-mentee relationship with Tom Wambsgans]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOnScreenDynamic
Context triple: [Greg Hirsch, hasOnScreenDynamic, mentor-mentee relationship with Tom Wambsgans]
  • A. hasOnscreenFunction
    Indicates that an entity serves a particular role or performs a specific function when it appears on screen.
  • B. hasScreen
    Indicates that an entity is equipped with or includes a screen or display component.
  • C. hasDynamics
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by specific dynamic behavior, changes, or variations over time in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. isPartOfDynamically
    Indicates that one entity is currently a component or member of another entity in a way that can change over time or at runtime.
  • E. hasTopScreenSize
    Indicates that an entity (typically a device) possesses a top screen with a specified size or dimension.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278d25148190abf1a8c8f5f533ad completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de6358c2288190ac1fd26e688a605d completed April 14, 2026, 3:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a7d586c8190846ff242bbf5ac53 completed April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de2e07d1f88190bdcd20967e484718 completed April 14, 2026, 12:07 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:10 a.m.