Triple
T14262944
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GATT Article XXI(b) is not entirely self-judging |
E353569
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisdictionalConsequence |
P76341
|
FINISHED |
| Object | panels decide whether they have competence to review Article XXI(b) invocations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: panels decide whether they have competence to review Article XXI(b) invocations | Statement: [GATT Article XXI(b) is not entirely self-judging, jurisdictionalConsequence, panels decide whether they have competence to review Article XXI(b) invocations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: jurisdictionalConsequence Context triple: [GATT Article XXI(b) is not entirely self-judging, jurisdictionalConsequence, panels decide whether they have competence to review Article XXI(b) invocations]
-
A.
hasJurisdictionalConsequence
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or fact results in a legal or administrative effect within a particular jurisdiction or authority.
-
B.
affectedJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one entity’s authority, control, or legal power extends over and impacts the jurisdiction of another entity.
-
C.
jurisdictionConflictWith
Indicates a situation where the legal or authoritative jurisdiction of one entity overlaps with, challenges, or is incompatible with that of another entity.
-
D.
intendedJurisdiction
Indicates the legal or geographic area over which something (such as a law, policy, or authority) is meant to have power or apply.
-
E.
concernsJurisdiction
Indicates that one entity has legal authority, control, or responsibility over another entity or over matters related to it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278c43e08190824146f4632b89a5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de63563fc88190b0abdbf8529c65eb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de2a7d586c8190846ff242bbf5ac53 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:09 a.m.