Triple

T14262865
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject DS512 E353567 entity
Predicate precedentialSignificance P40251 FINISHED
Object important for interpretation of national security exception in WTO law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: important for interpretation of national security exception in WTO law | Statement: [DS512, precedentialSignificance, important for interpretation of national security exception in WTO law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: precedentialSignificance
Context triple: [DS512, precedentialSignificance, important for interpretation of national security exception in WTO law]
  • A. hasPrecedentialStatus chosen
    Indicates that one legal decision or authority possesses a recognized level of precedential force or binding effect relative to others.
  • B. hasCourtPrecedence
    Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
  • C. precedentInterpreted
    Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
  • D. confersPrecedenceIn
    Indicates that one entity is granted higher priority, rank, or standing over another within a specified context or domain.
  • E. legalPrecedentInvolved
    Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278c43e08190824146f4632b89a5 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de63563fc88190b0abdbf8529c65eb completed April 14, 2026, 3:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a7d586c8190846ff242bbf5ac53 completed April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:09 a.m.